The Thin Red Line

            Seen in conjunction with The Tree of Life we recognise a common style with The Thin Red Line. Thematically, the script raises what philosophers might call “the problem of evil”. It does this in the context of fighting action between American and Japanese troops sometime during the second World War. A lot of use is made of voiceover, whereby the audience can benefit from hearing the internal monologues that the characters deliver. Some are bitter, like the inveterate military-man who bites his tongue in the presence of those superior in rank but who have unjustly, as he sees it, overlooked him for promotion. Some are homesick and others are war- and death-sick. Whit, a private played by Jim Caviezel, we sometimes are shown living among the Melanesian natives on the beaches of the island that the Americans and Japanese are contesting. His inner life is more outward looking, if that makes sense, as he himself apparently tries to make sense of the contrast between the extremely beautiful and extremely ugly aspects of life in that time and place, leading him to contemplate what might be beneath the surface of life itself. Interestingly, this capacity for reflection on life’s elusive fundamentals is accompanied by a concern for his comrades and a capacity for action. Although Sean Penn’s name is primary among the credited actors of what is really an extraordinary cast, Caviezel’s character is the screenplay’s fulcrum.

            The action sequences are exciting and, I guess, lifelike. There are two main such sequences. One, which occupies the most part of the movie, involves a battalion’s efforts to capture a strategic outpost from the Japanese. For much of this sequence, we are only aware of the presence of the enemy (from the American perspective) from the lethally whistling bullets that strafe the Americans, whose advances are tentative and trepidatious. We eventually see more of the Japanese soldiers, at a point in the story when emotions are pitched to levels that individuals rarely experience. It probably reflects badly on me that I began to view proceedings as an acting war between those playing the soldiers from the opposing armies. I imagined the camera scanning such an acting battlefield, where actors did their best to convey the horrors of war and victory was to do something that earned your performance a place in the final edit. Anyway, enough of that. The soundtrack is made up of what seem to be songs by a Melanesian Gospel choir. Some of the songs are very beautiful and I found them to be simultaneously familiar and mysterious, having heard gospel music before but not with the flavour of the pacific islands.

What with the level of craft evident in this movie, it could sustain repeated viewing. The result of the battles will always be the same, unfortunately, and favourite characters will get killed everytime, if that’s their fate, no matter how many times you watch it. Who are the “good guys”, though, is less easy to pin down with similar certainty, and this movie challenges us to broaden our perspectives on that question. Conclusions may be unsettling, viewer discretion advised.

 

archive                               hme